I was gonna try to change that too, you know? I thought I'd post some awesome recipe or something that made me gleeful and happy.
And then I had the misfortune of hearing about this odious little piece of shit "news" article.
It's called "A Boy's Life" and is (surprise) about a young trans girl. She had apparently told people that she was a girl SINCE BEING ABLE TO TALK. Yet the author of this horror uses the wrong pronouns and names for the entire story. That is, up until the young girl's mother decides that she's going to quit fighting the inevitable. So, just more proof that children aren't actual people, but tiny mobile extensions of their parents.
Here's a gem from the end:
It’s not impossible to imagine Brandon’sHer name is Bridget, which we find out in the last damn page, and which the author obviously knew well before printing the damn article
life going in another direction. His"Her" you fucking idiot
early life fits neatly into a Zucker[rhymes with Fucker] case study about family noise. Tina describes [Bridget] as “never leaving my side” during [her] early years. The diagnosis writes itself: father, distant and threatening; mother, protector; child overidentifies with strong maternal figure.Oh yeah,that's totally what happened, since the kid was identifying as a girl since age TWO. I personally base all of my gender identity on my memories of being two, don't you? Hello, paging Dr. Fucker, Freud's a crackpot, and you are too.
If Tina had lived in Toronto, if she’d had the patience for six years of Dr. [F]ucker’s therapy, if the therapy had been free, then who knows?"Who knows" indeed!, perhaps 'poor' Bridget could be 'cured'. Especially if her mom had just had the patience. What a tragic fate to be subjected to, just because her mother didn't live in range of a psychopath with a degree. Come to think of it, how did you Ms. Hanna Rosin, manage to get a journalism degree? Did you??????
Yet [F]ucker’s approach has its own disturbing elements.Other than refusing to acknowledge a child's gender identity? Do tell!
It’s easy to imagine that his methods—steering parents toward removing pink crayons from the box, extolling a patriarchy no one believes intell that to the hundreds of survivors of sexual violence that posted in the past 49 hours on Shakesville's survivor thread, or how about the women of fucking Afghanistan, who currently have legislation making it possible for their husbands to refuse to them medical treatment, oh and gives them no legal recourse against rape. Yeah NO ONE believes in the patriarchy.
—could instill in some children a sense of shame and a double life. A 2008 study of 25 girls [trans boys] who had been seen in [F]ucker’s clinic showed positive results;What do you think of as "positive"?
22 were no longer gender-dysphoric, meaning they were comfortable living as girls. But that doesn’t mean they were happyoh, silly, I thought that "positive" and "happy" were related!
I spoke to the mother of one [F]ucker patient in her late 20s, who said her [son] was repulsed by the thought of a sex change but was still suffering—[he’d] become an alcoholic, and was cutting [him]self. “I’d be surprised if she outlived me,” [his] mother said.You heard it folks, apparently none of these young transmen are trans anymore! They just want to/are trying to kill themselves. Sounds like a peachy fucking cure.
I literally couldn't read through this entire article. Maybe one day I'll have the stomach to give it the editing (for intelligence) it so clearly deserves.
Appalling. :(
ReplyDeleteWell, technically it's a feature article, but you failed to mention that it's in the ATLANTIC, formerly the ATLANTIC MONTHLY, one of the most prestigious news mags in this country.
ReplyDeleteWTF?
WTF/Appalling indeed.
ReplyDeleteWhat can I say, I'm an uncultured mass (all by myself, impressive, no?). I had no idea that ATLANTIC was something of note. Sadly, distinctions of "news" vs. "feature" seem silly to me: if you're a reputable publisher of information, why put crap out there?
My point was that this is even more shocking given the established reputation of the publication.
ReplyDeleteYeah. I should have been more clear. It should have said: "if you're a reputable publisher of information, why put crap out there under any guise! "news" or not." Also, I intended to direct that at the audience of media publishers that I pretend to have.
ReplyDeleteIn my perfect delusional world, I have quite a bit of clout. Thus, as the benevolent ruler of all newsmedia, they would immediately take heed of my derision and respond accordingly.